Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez

                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 20-1619
                        ___________________________

                                     Justin Neill

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

Dr. Roberto Saez; Nurse Shawna Stephens; Nurse Jessie Prince; Nurse Fran Infante

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: October 5, 2020
                              Filed: October 8, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

      In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Justin Neill challenges the district
court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the summary judgment record

      1
      The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
in a light most favorable to Neill, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor,
see Brewington v. Keener, 

902 F.3d 796

, 800 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review), we
agree that summary judgment was appropriate. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-
Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on NO-SCAM.com, it is strongly advised to avoid Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike No-Scam.com, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.
The above review and comments against Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez were submitted by NO-SCAM.com user(s) and have been published as-is. NO-SCAM.com does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their reviews or complaints and NO-SCAM.com will NOT entertain any request to remove the review on Justin Neill v. Roberto Saez at any cost whatsoever.
>