SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al.

On October 8, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Houston-based seismic data company, SAExploration Holdings Inc. (SAE), and four former executives for a multi-year accounting fraud that falsely inflated the company’s revenue by approximately $100 million and concealed the theft of millions of dollars by the executives. SAE issued restated financial statements in February and declared bankruptcy in August.

According to the SEC’s complaint, starting in 2015, SAE, at the direction of the four executives – former CEO and Chairman Jeffrey Hastings, former CFO and General Counsel Brent Whiteley, former CEO and COO Brian Beatty, and former VP of Operations Michael Scott -entered into a series of seismic data acquisition contracts totaling approximately $140 million with a purportedly unrelated Alaska-based company that was in fact controlled by Hastings and Whiteley. The complaint alleges that, of the amount SAE recorded in revenue, approximately $100 million was improperly recorded in light of the Alaskan company’s inability to pay and the SAE executives’ control of the company. As alleged in the complaint, to create the false impression that the Alaskan company was actually paying SAE for seismic data, Hastings, Whiteley, Beatty, and Scott misappropriated nearly $6 million from SAE and used the funds for a series of round trip transactions that caused the money to be sent back to SAE. The complaint alleges that, in addition, the executives also stole a total of approximately $6 million for themselves. The complaint further alleges that Whiteley separately misappropriated an additional $4 million through a fictitious invoice scheme.

The SEC’s complaint charges SAE, Hastings, Whiteley, Beatty, and Scott with violating Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. It further charges SAE with violating Securities Act Section 17(a)(2) and Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B), and Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13 thereunder, and that Hastings, Whiteley, Beatty, and Scott aided and abetted those violations. Additionally, the complaint charges Hastings, Whiteley, Beatty, and Scott with violating Exchange Act Section 13(b)(5) and Rule 13b2-1 thereunder, and Hastings, Whiteley, and Beatty with also violating Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 13a-14, and 13b2-2. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction against SAE and permanent injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and officer-and-director bars against the four executives. Additionally, the SEC seeks to have Hastings, Whiteley, and Beatty reimburse SAE for incentive-based compensation pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The complaint also charges Hastings’s and Whiteley’s spouses, Lori Hastings and Thomas O’Neill, as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced criminal charges against Hastings.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Yael Berger, Peter Fielding, and Andrea Fox, and supervised by Stacy Bogert, Peter Rosario, and Jennifer Leete. The litigation will be led by Nick Margida and supervised by Stephan Schlegelmilch. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

 

View the litigation release concerning civil lawsuits brought by the Commission in federal court against SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al..

A community member has initiated a collaboration campaign to investigate, research, interview, gather evidence, and compile a comprehensive dossier on SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al.. This webpage will, therefore, help in consolidating all information with which you can draw logical and valid inferences and conclusions.

Scope of Investigation on SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al.

In previous investigative reports on similar entities/individuals, our members unearthed serious issues related to -

  • Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Litigations and Lawsuits
  • Sexual Harassment Allegations
  • Bankruptcy
  • Criminal Conspiracy

Whenever our esteemed contributors alert us of a serious allegation against a subject, we strongly suggest investigating the claims thoroughly before publishing the report. Once published, we do NOT allow any sort of editing, tampering, or removal of the report.

Submit Anonymous Tip

To facilitate our community members, we have designated this space for the (upcoming) report and discussion on Ananda Hemp and encourage you to contribute by submitting vital information or sharing this page.

If you would like to share your experience with SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al., submit an anonymous tip, or add any document related to this investigation, you can do it by adding your comments below. Alternatively, you can communicate with the author(s) of the (upcoming) report by sending a direct message to the Moderators. If you rather contact the researchers via email, please contact us and we'll put you in touch with them.

All communication is encrypted and kept secure, and identities are protected. We do NOT share your details with anyone under any circumstances.

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on NO-SCAM.com, it is strongly advised to avoid SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al. in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al.. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike No-Scam.com, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al. is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.
The above review and comments against SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al. were submitted by NO-SCAM.com user(s) and have been published as-is. NO-SCAM.com does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their reviews or complaints and NO-SCAM.com will NOT entertain any request to remove the review on SAExploration Holdings, Inc., et al. at any cost whatsoever.
>