United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour

       USCA11 Case: 19-12210    Date Filed: 10/08/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-12210
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20716-UU-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

PAUL PIERRE DELATOUR,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (October 8, 2020)

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 19-12210       Date Filed: 10/08/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Paul Pierre Delatour in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Delatour’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2
Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on NO-SCAM.com, it is strongly advised to avoid United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike No-Scam.com, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.
The above review and comments against United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour were submitted by NO-SCAM.com user(s) and have been published as-is. NO-SCAM.com does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their reviews or complaints and NO-SCAM.com will NOT entertain any request to remove the review on United States v. Paul Pierre Delatour at any cost whatsoever.
>